Matthes Crest - S-N Traverse (III, 5.7) and Full Traverse (IV, 5.8)

Matthes Crest is pure Type 1 fun and a must-do for anyone climbing in the Sierra. The northern section is even better than the more popular southern section, although it is much more serious climbing and only appropriate for strong 5.8 leaders. This applies to both climbers as the climbing is often as serious for the follower as the leader.


Sean climbing "The Wave".


In 2010 I did the standard S-N Traverse as one of my first III, 5.7 climbs. In 2011 I returned and did the full traverse as my first Grade IV climb. Both trips were incredibly fun outings on perfect rock and under perfect weather conditions, and between the two trips I pretty well captured the experience of the ridge. For those that like surprises, beware the beta dump, but for the rest, enjoy the long photo trip report!


Matthes Crest Headwall, based on the two different ways I have climbed it



Matthes Crest seen from Tenaya Peak



Matthes Crest South Ridge seen from Tenaya Peak



Matthes Crest North Ridge seen from Tenaya Peak




Matthes Crest, South to North Traverse (III, 5.7)

September 4, 2010


I did this climb with Edward Lau, who I was introduced to via my friends Daniel Honneger and Mike Shen. It was yet another one of those climbs where I drove overnight and started hiking without sleep! Needless to say, I slept well this night.


Tresidder Peak ridge



Cathedral Peak on the approach


Despite carrying the rope and rack, I kept finding myself ahead of Eddy, so I entertained myself taking pictures of the foliage.


Corn Lilies



More Corn Lilies



Even More Corn Lilies



Ever More Corn Lilies



Fire!



More foliage



South section of Matthes Crest



North section of Matthes Crest


At last we were at the base of Matthes Crest, and we scrambled up the chute to the saddle in the ridge before the main headwall.


Matthes Crest



Echo Peaks



Echo Ridge



Matthes Crest



Fin at the start of the crest



Flowers



Flowers



View from the start


The headwall isn't too hard, but it is very steep. We pitched out the standard SuperTopo line for 3 pitches before we felt comfortable simul- climbing.


Edward leading the first pitch of the headwall. Note the other climber to the left. Another team later climbed in parallel to the right, so there are many ways to go here!



Looking back at the start of the simul-climb



Me climbing a fin unnecessarily. (by Edward Lau)



Looking South


While the climbing was very easy and the rock was amazingly solid and clean, the route is very exposed, and we didn't know when it might get more difficult, so we decided to simul-climb instead of roping up. I used running natural pro and as a result managed to cover the 1/3 mile section of ridge with the set and a half of cams and nuts that I brought, using most of the gear on the 5.2 downclimb to protect Eddy for following. Interestingly, because we were less timid simul-climbing than soloing, we caught up to some soloists, and mostly kept up with them throughout the route.


Bradley and Stefan on the ridge. They were a separate party that we kept running into on the ridge.



Looking back on the crest



Me nearing the fun Fin. (by Edward Lau)



Bradley and Stefan on the Fin.



The Fin. Definitely the highlight of the south ridge traverse.



Climbing the Fin. Supertopo says to go left of the ridge here, but that's not as fun. (by Edward Lau)


The fin was really fun. There was no pro, and the fin was very narrow (about as wide as a chair or less), but there were lots of feature to grab and edge on, and it reclined at a nice 45-50 degree angle. Falling would be serious even with a rope, but you could remain secure, and it was thrilling to be on such a long, narrow spine of rock! Although the SuperTopo topo shows a 5.6 traverse to the left of the fin, I don't see why anyone would take that way if they new about this!


The Fin



Extreme exposure



Continuing north, the difficulty eases but stays harder than earlier in the ridge, perhaps around cl. 4



Wee!



Echo Peaks and Matthes Crest dotted with climbers. One is on the summit of Matthes Crest.



Is this knife-edged enough? Eddy is following on exposed but very easy terrain.



Eddy on the rock playground



At the notch after the 5.2 downclimb, just before the crux 5.7 pitch to gain the N summit.


The downclimb gets a lot more exposed and a bit tricky, so the follower might want more protection here than elsewhere on the ridge. There are few features to drape the rope around, so save some cams for protecting the follower on this section.

The ledge at the notch is a very comfy place to take a lunch break.


Echo Peaks



The 5.7 crux pitch. It sure felt harder to me! It takes the thin finger crack on the wall. An awkward 5.8 variation ascends the corner and is better protected


I didn't care too much for the 5.7 pitch. It was very thin and balancy, with thin pro at your feet. It seemed like if you fell you would likely hit the ledge beneath (actually, on the next visit, a guy took a fall here, his last nut popped, and he hit the ledge before the next piece engaged. Fortunately it was mostly his pride that was hurt, and we belayed his party up after us).

Perhaps part of that feeling was because I was climbing with a pack on, and this pitch is made a LOT harder with weight pulling you out from the wall. I found it much more doable after I ditched the pack (note that the rappels take you by the ledge beneath this section, so you can leave your pack there if you're not continuing to the N Ridge).


Matthes Crest S-N Traverse



North Ridge of Matthes Crest


Most people only traverse to the summit, and then descend via two 50m rappels. This is an expedient way off, but it misses out on the best part of the crest! The next year, after I had gotten stronger at leading, I returned to attempt the northern section.

Links



Continued: Matthes Crest, Full Traverse (IV, 5.8)